Jailed NBA Referee`s Book Cancelled

Disgraced NBA referee Tim Donaghy`s book about his time refereeing pro basketball may have been shelved but the contents of the book appear to have leaked and they give bettors something to worry about.

Online sports new website Deadspin claims to have acquired a copy of `Blowing the Whistle: The Culture of Fraud in the NBA` by Tim Donaghy and if it is genuine he alleges plenty of corruption in the league.

Donaghy served eleven months in prison for his part in a gambling scandal and wrote the memoir during this time, but the publisher, Triumph Books, cancelled the book. Pat Bergan, the liaison between Donaghy and Triumph, claims the NBA threatened legal action. The NBA denies these claims.

Deadspin have released*excerpts from the book* "the NBA doesn`t want you to read". In one of them, Donaghy is alleged to have written:

`"To have a little fun at the expense of the worst troublemakers, the referees working the game would sometimes make a modest friendly wager amongst themselves: first ref to give one of the bad boys a technical foul wouldn`t have to tip the ball boy that night. In the NBA, ball boys set up the referees` locker room and keep it stocked with food and beer for the postgame meal. We usually ran the kid ragged with a variety of personal requests and then slipped him a $20 bill. Technically, the winner of the bet won twice-he didn`t have to pay the kid and he got to call a T on Mr. Foul-Mouthed Big-Shot Du Jour.

"After the opening tip, it was hilarious as the three of us immediately focused our full attention on the intended victim, waiting for something, anything, to justify a technical foul. If the guy so much as looked at one of us and mumbled, we rang him up. Later in the referees` locker room, we would down a couple of brews, eat some chicken wings, and laugh like hell.
We had another variation of this gag simply referred to as the "first foul of the game" bet. While still in the locker room before tip-off, we would make a wager on which of us would call the game`s first foul. That referee would either have to pay the ball boy or pick up the dinner tab for the other two referees. Sometimes, the ante would be $50 a guy. Like the technical foul bet, it was hilarious-only this time we were testing each other`s nerves to see who had the guts to hold out the longest before calling a personal foul. There were occasions when we would hold back for two or three minutes-an eternity in an NBA game-before blowing the whistle. It didn`t matter if bodies were flying all over the place; no fouls were called because no one wanted to lose the bet.
We played this little game during the regular season and summer league. After a game, all three refs would gather around the VCR and watch a replay of the game. Early in the contest, the announcers would say, "Holy cow! They`re really letting them play tonight!" If they only knew...

"During one particular summer game, Duke Callahan, Mark Wunderlich, and I made it to the three-minute mark in the first quarter without calling a foul. We were running up and down the court, laughing our asses off as the players got hammered with no whistles. The players were exhausted from the nonstop running when Callahan finally called the first foul because Mikki Moore of the New Jersey Nets literally tackled an opposing player right in front of him. Too bad for Callahan-he lost the bet.

"I became so good at this game that if an obvious foul was committed right in front of me, I would call a travel or a three-second violation instead. Those violations are not personal fouls, so I was still in the running to win the bet. The players would look at me with disbelief on their faces as if to say, "What the hell was that?" `

In another passage, Donaghy allegedly claims the NBA trained their referees to enhance the success of players with `star status `. He uses the particular example of Lakers star Kobe Bryant and tenacious defender Raja Bell:

"Relationships between NBA players and referees were generally all over the board-love, hate, and everything in-between. Some players, even very good ones, were targeted by referees and the league because they were too talented for their own good. Raja Bell, formerly of the Phoenix Suns and now a member of the Charlotte Bobcats, was one of those players. A defensive specialist throughout his career, Bell had a reputation for being a "star stopper." His defensive skills were so razor sharp that he could shut down a superstar, or at least make him work for his points. Kobe Bryant was often frustrated by Bell`s tenacity on defense. Let`s face it, no one completely shuts down a player of Kobe`s caliber, but Bell could frustrate Kobe, take him out of his game, and interrupt his rhythm.

"You would think that the NBA would love a guy who plays such great defense. Think again! Star stoppers hurt the promotion of marquee players. Fans don`t pay high prices to see players like Raja Bell-they pay to see superstars like Kobe Bryant score 40 points. Basketball purists like to see good defense, but the NBA wants the big names to score big points.
If a player of Kobe`s stature collides with the likes of Raja Bell, the call will almost always go for Kobe and against Bell. As part of our ongoing training and game preparation, NBA referees regularly receive game-action video tape from the league office. Over the years, I have reviewed many recorded hours of video involving Raja Bell. The footage I analyzed usually illustrated fouls being called against Bell, rarely for him. The message was subtle but clear-call fouls against the star stopper because he`s hurting the game.
If Kobe Bryant had two fouls in the first or second quarter and went to the bench, one referee would tell the other two, "Kobe`s got two fouls. Let`s make sure that if we call a foul on him, it`s an obvious foul, because otherwise he`s gonna go back to the bench. If he is involved in a play where a foul is called, give the foul to another player."

"Similarly, when games got physically rough, we would huddle up and agree to tighten the game up. So we started calling fouls on guys who didn`t really matter-"ticky-tack" or "touch" fouls where one player just touched another but didn`t really impede his progress. Under regular circumstances these wouldn`t be fouls, but after a skirmish we wanted to regain control. We would never call these types of fouls on superstars, just on the average players who didn`t have star status. It was important to keep the stars on the floor. `

Game six of the 2002 Western Conference Finals between the Kings and the Lakers was much discussed due to some questionable decisions long before the charges against Donaghy. Deadspin quote him as writing the following:

"The 2002 Western Conference Finals between the Los Angeles Lakers and the Sacramento Kings presents a stunning example of game and series manipulation at its ugliest. As the teams prepared for Game 6 at the Staples Center, Sacramento had a 3–2 lead in the series. The referees assigned to work Game 6 were Dick Bavetta, Bob Delaney, and Ted Bernhardt. As soon as the referees for the game were chosen, the rest of us knew immediately that there would be a Game 7. A prolonged series was good for the league, good for the networks, and good for the game. Oh, and one more thing: it was great for the big-market, star-studded Los Angeles Lakers.

"In the pregame meeting prior to Game 6, the league office sent down word that certain calls-calls that would have benefitted the Lakers — were being missed by the referees. This was the type of not-so-subtle information that I and other referees were left to interpret. After receiving the dispatch, Bavetta openly talked about the fact that the league wanted a Game 7.
"If we give the benefit of the calls to the team that`s down in the series, nobody`s going to complain. The series will be even at three apiece, and then the better team can win Game 7," Bavetta stated.

"As history shows, Sacramento lost Game 6 in a wild come-from-behind thriller that saw the Lakers repeatedly sent to the foul line by the referees. For other NBA referees watching the game on television, it was a shameful performance by Bavetta`s crew, one of the most poorly officiated games of all time. `

Deadspin tells us that Donaghy is looking for another publisher and may even self-publish the book but for gamblers it is an insight into how much referees can influence a game and how many forces there can be at work. It also reminds us that it is always vital to look at who is policing matches and the motivations they have in making their decisions before investing money on the outcome of a match.


url=http://www.liveoddsandscores.com/basketball/406296/jailed-nba-referees-book-cancelled?rss=basketballMore from Live Odds and Scores